By Thobeka Makume
The University of Limpopo has stood by its decision to deregister two master’s degree students in their second year, citing non-compliance with admission criteria. The deregistration of Philisiwe Cele and Ntando Mnguni, who were pursuing master’s degrees in information sciences, has sparked debate and legal action, with both students contesting the decision as they approached graduation.
In a statement, the institution highlighted that its policies permit the termination of any student’s registration if probable cause arises. According to the university, the deregistration in February 2023 was based on the discovery that the students did not meet specific admission requirements, even though they had advanced to their second year of studies. This decision has not only raised questions around procedural fairness but has also ignited discussions on the contractual obligations between students and universities.
The university’s legal representative, Advocate Mbuso Majozi, argued in the Limpopo High Court on Wednesday that the relationship between the students and the university is governed by a contract, which both parties entered into upon registration. He stated, “When the two students signed their acceptance forms, they entered into a contractual agreement with the institution. There is a term in the contract that says we accept you; your acceptance is provisional and will remain provisional. To the extent that we pick up any irregularity in your registration, we can review your admission.”
The Basis of Deregistration: Admission Requirements and Contractual Agreements
The university’s primary contention revolves around the academic qualifications of Cele and Mnguni, who hold B-Tech degrees instead of the traditional Bachelor’s degrees typically required for the master’s program. According to the institution, this qualification discrepancy came to light during a routine audit, leading to their deregistration. Advocate Majozi asserted that the university’s policies clearly outline that any irregularities in admission qualifications give the institution the right to reassess and revoke provisional acceptance.
The university’s defence is grounded in the contractual nature of student registrations, where an acceptance is provisionally granted pending verification of qualifications. This conditional acceptance, Majozi explained, forms a key aspect of the agreement signed by both students.
Students’ Response: Allegations of Procedural Unfairness and Legal Recourse
On the other hand, Cele and Mnguni are challenging the university’s actions as procedurally unfair, arguing that their deregistration at such an advanced stage in their studies is not only unjust but also damaging to their academic and professional future. They contend that the institution’s decision to revoke their registration, after nearly two years of study and financial investment, was abrupt and lacked adequate transparency.
The students’ counsel highlighted that the two were already on the brink of completing their dissertations when the deregistration occurred. For Cele and Mnguni, the sudden withdrawal of their student status without prior notification or an opportunity to address the university’s concerns was an unjust disruption to their academic journey.
Legal Precedent and Broader Implications in Higher Education
The legal action brought against the University of Limpopo by Cele and Mnguni is seen as a test case with broader implications for higher education governance and student rights in South Africa. Experts suggest that this case could set a precedent regarding the responsibilities of higher education institutions in clearly communicating their admissions policies, as well as their accountability in following fair administrative procedures.
While the university maintains that its actions were within legal and contractual bounds, critics argue that universities should balance academic policies with consideration for the students’ time and resources invested in their studies. Observers within the legal and academic fields are following this case closely, as it brings to light the complexities surrounding provisional admissions and the implications of such decisions on students’ futures.
Institutional Accountability and Policy Reform
This case has also sparked a larger discussion about the transparency and accountability of academic institutions. Many are now calling for universities to reassess their policies on provisional admissions to avoid similar incidents in the future. This could include better screening processes and clearer communication at the onset of admissions to prevent such misunderstandings.
The University of Limpopo has defended its admission policies, stating that they are designed to maintain academic standards and ensure that students meet the necessary qualifications for their programs. However, for Cele and Mnguni, this explanation does little to mitigate the impact of the sudden deregistration on their career paths.
The Role of Provisional Admissions in South Africa’s Higher Education
In the context of South Africa’s higher education landscape, provisional admissions are a common practice, particularly as universities seek to expand access and accommodate students from varied educational backgrounds. However, this flexibility also brings with it challenges, as demonstrated in the case of Cele and Mnguni. Some academics argue that while provisional admissions allow greater access to tertiary education, they require rigorous vetting processes to ensure that students meet the minimum qualifications.
Critics believe that if institutions are permitted to revoke student admissions after a period of study, there should be a clear protocol in place to manage these decisions without disproportionately impacting students. In particular, they point to the financial and emotional toll of such actions, arguing that universities have a duty to consider these factors before taking drastic measures.
Moving Forward: Potential Outcomes and Reform
As the Limpopo High Court deliberates on the case, education experts are calling for reforms in how provisional admissions are managed across the country. Many advocate for more comprehensive admissions assessments and greater clarity on the provisional status of admissions. Additionally, student representatives are urging universities to adopt more supportive measures for students affected by administrative decisions.
The outcome of this case could influence how South African universities approach provisional admissions, potentially leading to nationwide policy changes. For Cele and Mnguni, however, the immediate concern remains the continuity of their academic careers and the possibility of resuming their studies.
Public Reactions and Calls for Student Support Mechanisms
The case has garnered widespread attention, with student organisations and educational advocacy groups voicing their support for Cele and Mnguni. Many argue that the lack of communication and support from the university reflects a larger issue within South Africa’s higher education system, where students often face administrative challenges without adequate recourse.
The South African Union of Students (SAUS) issued a statement expressing solidarity with the students, emphasizing the need for institutions to adopt fairer practices. “The deregistration of these students reflects a concerning lack of consideration for their well-being and academic futures. Universities should not only enforce rules but also support students through their academic journeys,” the statement read.
Legal Perspective on Contractual Agreements in Education
The ongoing court case has also raised legal questions about the binding nature of student contracts with universities. Legal experts suggest that while universities may have the right to enforce academic standards, they must also adhere to procedural fairness in exercising these rights. In South Africa, the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) offers some degree of protection for students, who are considered consumers in the education sector. Legal analysts argue that if the university’s actions are deemed procedurally unfair, Cele and Mnguni could potentially claim damages under the CPA.
Advocate Thabo Manamela, a legal expert in education law, commented, “If the court finds that the University of Limpopo failed to follow due process, this case could open the door for other students who face similar issues with deregistration or expulsion to seek legal redress under consumer protection laws.”
Download Here:
Read all our publications on magzter:
https://www.magzter.com/ZA/Central-News-Pty-Ltd/Central-News/Newspaper/All-Issues
_______________________
Central News also offers Sponsored Editorial Content, Podcasts , Radio / Social Media Simulcast, Video Production , Live Streaming Services, Press Conferences, and Paid Interviews (Video/Audio) etc.
We guarantee exceptional exposure, reach, and engagement, with an excellent return on investment.
Advertisement:
To place your advert on our platforms (Print Newspaper or Digital Platforms) : Please email : sales@centralnews.co.za
For Business Related:
business@centralnews.co.za
Newsroom:
Send your Stories / Media Statements To: newsroom@centralnews.co.za
General Info:
info@centralnews.co.za
Office Administrator:
admin@centralnews.co.za
Whatsapp / Call: 081 495 5487
Website: https://www.centralnews.co.za
Social Media Platforms (@centralnewsza) : Linkedin, Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube
#centralnewsza #freestate