South African Football Association (SAFA)
By Lerato Mpembe
South African Football Association (SAFA) president Danny Jordaan is set to return to court on Friday, facing charges of theft and fraud linked to the alleged misuse of R1.3 million in SAFA funds for personal benefit. The high-profile case, which has drawn significant public and political attention, was postponed to allow legal proceedings to unfold after Jordaan and his co-accused failed in their bid to have the charges dropped.
This marks another critical moment for South African football administration, with questions raised about financial transparency and governance within SAFA. The case against Jordaan comes amid growing concerns over accountability in national sports organisations, particularly SAFA and the South African Rugby Union (SARU).
Court Proceedings: Defence and State at Loggerheads
The last court appearance saw a tense legal battle unfold, with two key applications presented—one from the State and another from Jordaan’s defence team.
1. State Seeks to Remove Jordaan’s Legal Counsel
• The prosecution sought to have Advocate Norman Arendse, who is representing Jordaan and his co-accused, recuse himself from the case.
• The State argued that Arendse’s dual role as SAFA’s legal representative created a conflict of interest, given that SAFA is directly implicated in the matter.
• The court, however, dismissed this application, allowing Arendse to continue representing Jordaan.
2. Jordaan’s Application to Strike the Case from the Roll
• Jordaan and his legal team applied to have the case struck from the court roll, citing unreasonable delays in the proceedings.
• The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) opposed the application, arguing that the delays were not unjustified and that Jordaan must answer to the charges in a full trial.
• The magistrate dismissed this request, ensuring that the case will proceed.
With both applications rejected, the case is set to continue, and the defence is expected to take further instructions from Jordaan and his co-accused in Friday’s proceedings.
The Allegations: How SAFA Funds Were Allegedly Misused
At the centre of the case is the alleged misappropriation of R1.3 million in SAFA funds. According to the State’s case, the money was intended for SAFA operations but was instead diverted for Jordaan’s personal benefit.
While details surrounding the specific transactions remain sealed in court documents, sources indicate that the funds may have been linked to questionable financial dealings and possible mismanagement within SAFA’s financial structures.
The case has raised serious governance concerns at SAFA, an organisation already under scrutiny for irregular financial management. Reports suggest that several past financial transactions within SAFA have raised red flags, prompting parliamentary oversight committees to increase scrutiny on sports governance.
Parliamentary Sport Committee Monitoring SAFA and SARU
Jordaan’s legal troubles come at a time when Parliament’s Sport Committee has intensified its oversight of SAFA and SARU’s financial and administrative management.
Lawmakers have vowed to continue probing SAFA’s finances, particularly in light of Jordaan’s case. The committee has also expressed concerns over financial accountability within SARU, urging greater transparency and governance reforms within South Africa’s major sporting bodies.
Committee chairperson Beauty Dlulane has previously called for stronger governance controls at SAFA, highlighting the need for independent audits and financial oversight mechanisms to prevent future financial mismanagement.
“Sports federations are custodians of national assets and must be held accountable for every cent. We will not back down from ensuring financial integrity in these organisations,” Dlulane said in a statement.
Jordaan’s Legal Strategy and Defence
Jordaan has consistently denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that the charges are politically and administratively motivated.
His legal team has signalled that they will challenge the credibility of the financial evidence presented by the State, arguing that SAFA’s financial records do not support the allegation of theft or fraud.
Advocate Norman Arendse has indicated that the defence will present alternative explanations for the funds in question and argue that internal SAFA financial processes were followed.
Legal experts suggest that the case could hinge on forensic financial analysis, which will either confirm or dispute the State’s claims of misappropriation.
🔴 Central News Special Edition | Issue 091 🔴 Download the Latest Print and E-Edition | Headline: Ndlozi on Ramaphosa: “He’s Not What We Were Told” – A Surprising Change in Tone”
Download Here:
Direct PDF Link:
https://centralnews.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Central-News-Issue-091.pdf
Read all our publications on magzter:
https://www.magzter.com/ZA/Central-News-Pty-Ltd/Central-News/Newspaper/All-Issues
Central News also offers Sponsored Editorial Content, Podcasts , Radio / Social Media Simulcast, Video Production , Live Streaming Services, Press Conferences, and Paid Interviews (Video/Audio) etc.
We guarantee exceptional exposure, reach, and engagement, with an excellent return on investment.
Advertisement:
To place your advert on our platforms (Print Newspaper or Digital Platforms) : Please email : sales@centralnews.co.za
For Business Related:
business@centralnews.co.za
Newsroom:
Send your Stories / Media Statements To: newsroom@centralnews.co.za
General Info:
info@centralnews.co.za
Office Administrator:
admin@centralnews.co.za
Whatsapp / Call: 081 495 5487
Website: https://www.centralnews.co.za
Social Media Platforms (@centralnewsza) : Linkedin, Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube