NPA
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has decided not to prosecute Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema for alleged animal cruelty linked to a 2023 video showing a botched cow slaughter, pointing to insufficient evidence as the main reason.
Background to the Controversial Incident
Back in July 2023, a video that quickly spread across social media captured Julius Malema, the head of the EFF, trying to slaughter a cow during preparations for the party’s 10th anniversary celebrations. The event took place at a farm in Magaliesberg, where the slaughter was meant to be part of a ceremonial ritual ahead of the main gathering at FNB Stadium. In the footage, Malema is seen using a small, blunt knife to stab the animal repeatedly in the area between its head and ears, known as the poll region. Reports indicate he twisted the knife and struck the cow up to 11 times, leading to prolonged distress and suffering for the animal before it finally died.
This method drew sharp criticism because it did not result in a quick and humane kill, which is required under South African law. Animal welfare experts explained that proper slaughter practices should aim to minimise pain, often by stunning the animal first or using a sharp tool for a swift cut. Instead, the video showed the cow struggling and in clear agony, sparking widespread public outrage among those who viewed it online. Many people called for action, highlighting how such acts go against the principles of kindness towards animals that are increasingly valued in modern society.
The Animals Protection Act No. 71 of 1962, which governs how animals must be treated in South Africa, prohibits any actions that cause unnecessary suffering. This includes during slaughter, whether for food, cultural reasons, or ceremonies. The law stresses that all animals deserve protection from cruelty, and violations can lead to criminal charges. In this case, the video raised questions about whether the slaughter was carried out in a way that respected these rules, especially since ceremonial slaughters are allowed but must still follow humane standards.
NSPCA Steps In with Strong Evidence
The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA), an organisation dedicated to protecting animals from harm, took swift action after the video surfaced. On 29 August 2023, they lodged formal criminal charges against Malema, arguing that his actions breached the Animals Protection Act. “The case stems from a widely circulated video depicting Malema attempting to slaughter a cow in a manner the NSPCA believes violated the Animals Protection Act and inflicted unnecessary suffering,” the NSPCA stated at the time.
To build a solid case, the NSPCA gathered a range of proof. This included the original viral video, additional supplementary footage, sworn affidavits from witnesses, and even input from a key eyewitness who was at the scene and captured more details on camera. These efforts showed the organisation’s commitment to thorough investigation, as they believed the evidence clearly demonstrated cruelty. Over nearly two years, the NSPCA pushed the matter forward, escalating it through various levels of the justice system. They started with the local Public Prosecutor, then moved to the Chief Public Prosecutor, the Director of Public Prosecutions, and finally the National Director of Public Prosecutions. Each step was aimed at ensuring the case got the attention it deserved.
Despite these persistent efforts, the process faced hurdles, including procedural delays and what some see as bureaucratic challenges in handling animal-related crimes. The NSPCA’s work in this area is part of their wider mission to enforce animal welfare laws across the country, from farms to urban areas, where issues like improper slaughter often go unnoticed.
NPA’s Decision and Key Reasons
After reviewing all the materials, the NPA recently announced their choice not to move forward with prosecution. In a letter sent to the NSPCA, they explained the reasoning in clear terms. “Yet, in a letter to the NSPCA, the NPA stated ‘the prosecution will not be in a position to adduce sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt’ that a contravention of the act occurred. The letter further cited the ‘authenticity’ of the video footage as a concern.”
This means the NPA felt they could not gather enough strong proof to convince a court that the law was broken without any doubt. Proving cases beyond reasonable doubt is a high standard in South African courts, especially for criminal matters, and concerns about whether the video was genuine or possibly altered played a big role in their thinking. They worried that questions around the footage’s reliability might weaken the case if it went to trial.
This decision came after a long wait, highlighting how animal cruelty cases can sometimes struggle to gain traction in the legal system. While the NPA has the independence to make such calls based on evidence, it left many wondering about the challenges in prosecuting high-profile figures or cases involving cultural practices.
NSPCA Expresses Deep Disappointment
The NSPCA did not hide their frustration with the outcome. In their response, they shared a sense of letdown after investing so much time and resources. “While we acknowledge and respect the independence of the prosecutorial process, we are disheartened by this outcome. We believed the available evidence merited judicial consideration. This decision will no doubt be dismaying to many South Africans who care deeply about the humane treatment of animals.
“This matter also underscores a broader issue: the continued struggle for animals to achieve visibility and protection in the justice system. The law must be applied consistently,” the NSPCA added.
Their statement reflects a mix of respect for the legal process and a call for better protection for animals. They pointed out that this is not just about one incident but about ensuring animals are seen as deserving of justice, no matter who is involved. The organisation encouraged the public to stay engaged, suggesting ways like donating or becoming supporters to help fund future efforts in animal welfare.
🔴 Central News Special Edition | Issue 112 🔴 Download the Latest Print and E-Edition | Headline: Ngwathe Local Municipality’s R2 Billion Budget Rejected as Unfunded by Free
State Treasury
Download Here:
Direct PDF Link:
https://centralnews.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Central-News-Issue-112.pdf
Read all our publications on magzter:
https://www.magzter.com/ZA/Central-News-Pty-Ltd/Central-News/Newspaper/All-Issues
Central News also offers Sponsored Editorial Content, Podcasts , Radio / Social Media Simulcast, Video Production , Live Streaming Services, Press Conferences, and Paid Interviews (Video/Audio) etc.
We guarantee exceptional exposure, reach, and engagement, with an excellent return on investment.
Advertisement:
To place your advert on our platforms (Print Newspaper or Digital Platforms) : Please email : sales@centralnews.co.za
For Business Related:
business@centralnews.co.za
Newsroom:
Send your Stories / Media Statements To: newsroom@centralnews.co.za
General Info:
info@centralnews.co.za
Office Administrator:
admin@centralnews.co.za
Whatsapp / Call: 081 495 5487
Website: https://www.centralnews.co.za
Social Media Platforms (@centralnewsza) : Linkedin, Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube