Legal U-Turn
Pretoria – In a surprising twist at the heart of a high-stakes inquiry, Witness F – a police officer testifying partially behind closed doors and already implicated through earlier evidence – has pulled back his urgent legal challenge aimed at stopping his full appearance before the Madlanga Commission, paving the way for his testimony to continue without further court hurdles.
This decision comes after weeks of tense back-and-forth, where the witness fought tooth and nail to delay or block parts of his evidence, citing fears that speaking out could dig his own grave in potential criminal matters. Now, with the path cleared, the focus shifts back to the commission’s probe into serious claims of corruption and shady dealings that have gripped public attention.
The Sudden Withdrawal and What It Means
Witness F, whose real name stays under wraps for safety reasons, ditched his bid before the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria just days before it was due for a hearing. The move followed the commission’s push ahead with his initial testimony last week, where key WhatsApp chats were already laid bare for scrutiny. These messages, central to the case, reportedly tie into broader allegations of misconduct.
By stepping back, Witness F avoids a courtroom showdown that could have dragged on, but it also means he must now face the music fully. Set to return to the stand on Monday at the Brigitte Mabandla Justice College, his evidence could unlock more details on the web of intrigue the commission is untangling. Insiders say this U-turn might stem from realising the court fight was a lost cause, especially after judges slammed similar delay tactics in related cases.
This isn’t the first time Witness F has tried to hit the brakes. His legal team, led by advocate Hartley Ngoato, had argued that rushing him to testify without enough prep time was unfair and could breach his rights. Yet, the commission, chaired by respected Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, stood firm, stressing the need for speed and fairness in a probe that’s already shone a light on dark corners of power.
Inside the Madlanga Commission: A Probe into Hidden Networks
The Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, set up to dig into claims of infiltration and corruption within key institutions like law enforcement and possibly the judiciary, has become a focal point for South Africans hungry for accountability. Launched amid whispers of state capture echoes, it zeroes in on how criminal elements might have wormed their way into official circles, using bribes, threats, and secret deals to sway outcomes.
At its core are stories of betrayal and danger. Witness F, a member of Gauteng’s Organised Crime unit, popped up in CCTV footage from the home of Katiso “KT” Molefe, where he was spotted leaving with a bag – a detail that raised eyebrows and sparked questions about what might have been inside. This ties into wider tales of money changing hands, influence peddling, and even links to violent crimes, like the gunning down of Marius van der Westhuizen in Boksburg last year.
The commission’s work goes beyond one person. It has heard from a cast of characters, including ANC-linked businessman Suleiman Carrim, who recently won a short delay to testify in March after his own failed court bid to dodge the subpoena. Judges called his efforts obstructive, ordering him to pay costs and show up. Such rulings show a growing impatience with stalling, as the inquiry races to wrap up and deliver findings that could shake up systems.
Experts explain that commissions like this act as truth-seekers, gathering sworn statements, documents, and digital trails to build a picture of wrongdoing. Under Section 6 rules, refusing to play ball can land you in hot water, facing charges for obstruction. That’s why Witness F’s initial threats to boycott – saying he wouldn’t answer questions until his court plea was sorted – added drama, but ultimately fizzled when the high court shut down his postponement pleas.
Witness F’s Rocky Road to the Stand
Witness F’s journey to this point has been bumpy. Early on, he balked at testifying, telling the commission flat out: “I will not testify” until his legal moves were done. His lawyer pushed for breaks, once even asking to adjourn because the witness felt dizzy from hunger after a long day. The commission granted short breathers but refused big delays, with Justice Madlanga reminding everyone that fairness cuts both ways – to witnesses and the public seeking answers.
Fear of self-incrimination loomed large. Witness F worried that his words could be used against him in future trials, especially with WhatsApp exchanges showing chats that might hint at dodgy links. These messages, pulled from phones and servers, form a digital breadcrumb trail that evidence leaders like Matthew Chaskalson have used to grill others. To ease such fears, commissions often offer protections, like in-camera sessions where the public can’t watch, allowing sensitive info to flow without full exposure.
But the pressure mounted. An urgent high court application to block the use of those chats and halt his testimony got nowhere, with judges seeing it as another stall. When proceedings kicked off anyway, displaying the messages, Witness F’s team likely saw the writing on the wall – fighting on would just prolong the inevitable.
Adding to the tension, there’s talk of real dangers. A recent alleged hit attempt on DeAndre Pretorius, a man mentioned by another witness and linked to the probe, underscores the risks. Mentioned by Witness D, this incident in Boksburg echoes the van der Westhuizen killing, suggesting that poking into these networks can turn deadly. Such threats explain why Witness F testifies partially in-camera, shielding his face and voice from broadcasts to protect him and his family.
Broader Impacts on Justice and Public Trust
This saga highlights bigger cracks in South Africa’s fight against graft. Infiltration – where crooks cosy up to cops or judges – erodes faith in the system, making ordinary folks doubt if justice is blind or bought. The Madlanga Commission, much like past ones on state capture, aims to expose these rot spots, recommending fixes like tighter oversight, better whistleblower shields, and stiffer penalties for meddlers.
For police officers like Witness F, it’s a tightrope. As insiders, they hold key insights but risk backlash for speaking up. His evidence could reveal how organised crime units got tangled in the very webs they should unravel, perhaps through bribes or coercion. If proven, it might lead to arrests, reforms, or even a shake-up in leadership.
Public reaction mixes hope and scepticism. Many cheer the push for truth, seeing it as a step towards cleaner governance. Others worry about witch hunts or political scores being settled. With elections looming, the commission’s outcomes could sway votes, pressuring parties to clean house.
Economically, unchecked corruption costs billions, diverting funds from roads, schools, and jobs. By rooting it out, inquiries like this save cash and rebuild investor trust, helping the economy bounce back.
Looking Ahead: Testimony and Potential Fallout
As Witness F gears up for Monday, eyes will be on what he spills. Will he confirm the bag incident? Explain the WhatsApps? Point fingers at higher-ups? Justice Madlanga has kept things tight, excusing him until then but warning against more games.
The commission plans extra days for his grilling, likely 16 and 17 February, showing they expect meaty details. Meanwhile, other witnesses like Carrim wait in the wings, his March slot a brief reprieve.
In the end, this legal U-turn might speed up revelations, bringing closure to a probe that’s already exposed uncomfortable truths. For South Africa, it’s a reminder that accountability, though messy, is key to healing divides and building a fairer future. As the hearings roll on, the nation watches, hoping for justice that sticks.
🔴Central News Special Edition | Issue 122: Download the Latest Print and E-Edition | Suspended Ekurhuleni Deputy Chief Julius Mkhwanazi Vows ‘I Can’t Go to Jail and Leave My Kids’ Amid Blue Lights Saga Scrutiny 🔴
Download here⬇️⬇️⬇️
Read all our publications on magzter:
https://www.magzter.com/ZA/Central-News-Pty-Ltd/Central-News/Newspaper/All-Issues
Central News also offers Sponsored Editorial Content, Podcasts , Radio / Social Media Simulcast, Video Production , Live Streaming Services, Press Conferences, and Paid Interviews (Video/Audio) etc.
We guarantee exceptional exposure, reach, and engagement, with an excellent return on investment.
Advertisement:
To place your advert on our platforms (Print Newspaper or Digital Platforms) : Please email : sales@centralnews.co.za
For Business Related:
business@centralnews.co.za
Newsroom:
Send your Stories / Media Statements To: newsroom@centralnews.co.za
General Info:
info@centralnews.co.za
Office Administrator:
admin@centralnews.co.za
Whatsapp / Call: 081 495 5487
Website: https://www.centralnews.co.za
Social Media Platforms (@centralnewsza) : Linkedin, Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube