By Thabo Mosia
Fraud and corruption charges against former Sports, Arts, and Culture Minister Zizi Kodwa and former EOH executive Jehan Mackay have been withdrawn by the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). This decision has sparked significant debate in South African political circles, as well as a mixed public response. The charges, which stemmed from allegations of a R1.6 million bribe, were reportedly tied to government procurement processes. Kodwa and Mackay appeared in the Palm Ridge Magistrate’s Court on Friday, where the DPP’s office announced the withdrawal, explaining that recent representations had revealed new developments that altered the case’s trajectory.
The decision to drop the charges follows a turbulent period for Kodwa, who resigned from his ministerial post in the wake of the allegations. While his lawyer, Zola Majavu, expressed relief, welcoming the DPP’s conclusion, many South Africans remain sceptical, viewing this development as symptomatic of deeper issues within the ANC. The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has faced increasing scrutiny over perceived leniency in dealing with high-profile members accused of corruption, which continues to erode public trust in the party.
The Allegations: A Brief Background
The allegations against Kodwa and Mackay date back to April 2015 to February 2016, when Kodwa served as the ANC’s National Spokesperson. According to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Mackay allegedly facilitated payments and luxury accommodation worth over R1.6 million for Kodwa, ostensibly as gratifications in exchange for influencing government contracts. These alleged transactions suggested that Kodwa leveraged his political position to advance Mackay’s business interests in South Africa’s competitive procurement landscape.
Despite the gravity of these charges, the DPP, Advocate Andrew Chauke, decided to withdraw them after thoroughly reviewing representations made by the accused. The NPA’s spokesperson, Phindi Mjonondwane, confirmed that the decision was guided by “the interest of justice” and new information that “diminished the prospects of a successful prosecution.” According to Mjonondwane, the evidential material, along with input from the Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit and consultation with investigating officers, led the DPP to conclude that continuing the prosecution would not be viable.
Kodwa’s Reaction: Relief and Reflections on a Difficult Journey
Following the DPP’s announcement, Kodwa spoke to the media, expressing mixed feelings about the conclusion of his legal ordeal. Standing beside his lawyer, Majavu, who praised his client’s composure during the investigation, Kodwa shared the emotional toll of the accusations. He thanked his legal team, the ANC, and the millions of South Africans who offered support through prayer and solidarity.
Reflecting on the ordeal, Kodwa acknowledged the difficult decision he had made to resign as a minister when the charges were initially laid. “There is no law that requires a serving minister to resign when charged,” Kodwa remarked, “but I thought it would be inappropriate to continue serving under these circumstances.” He also highlighted his commitment to upholding the rule of law, noting his full cooperation with the Hawks and the NPA throughout the investigation.
This case is particularly relevant within the ANC’s current context, where public trust in the party’s commitment to transparency and accountability is increasingly fragile. While Kodwa praised the ANC’s support during his ordeal, critics argue that his reinstatement and the ANC’s continued backing reflect a problematic pattern within the ruling party – one where high-profile individuals accused of corruption often evade meaningful consequences.
The Role of the NPA and DPP: Discretion and Public Accountability
The NPA’s decision to withdraw the charges has reignited debate around prosecutorial discretion and accountability in South Africa. The NPA’s Prosecution Policy Directives allow for representations by accused individuals, providing an opportunity to review cases based on new evidence or considerations. However, some South Africans view the withdrawal of charges as emblematic of a legal system that often appears to favour the politically connected.
Mjonondwane defended the DPP’s decision, asserting that it was made “without fear, favour, and prejudice,” and aligned with the NPA’s constitutional mandate. She clarified that the NPA’s role is to assess cases based on legal merit, not public opinion. Yet, given South Africa’s ongoing struggle with corruption, the perception of preferential treatment for high-ranking ANC officials remains pervasive. The public’s frustration with this perceived leniency reflects a broader dissatisfaction with the ANC’s handling of corruption within its ranks.
Kodwa’s Loyalty to the ANC: Stepping Aside and Political Implications
In line with the ANC’s 55th Conference resolutions, Kodwa voluntarily stepped aside from all ANC activities when the charges were filed. This decision, while framed as a commitment to party principles, highlights the ANC’s internal challenges in enforcing accountability. The ANC’s step-aside rule, which mandates that members facing serious charges relinquish their positions, has been inconsistently applied, leading to accusations of selective enforcement.
Kodwa’s voluntary withdrawal from ANC activities contrasts sharply with the party’s handling of other cases. Critics argue that the ANC’s approach to enforcing the step-aside rule lacks consistency, with some members remaining in their positions despite facing similar accusations. Kodwa’s reinstatement, following the DPP’s decision, further complicates the ANC’s efforts to present itself as a party committed to ethical governance.
ANC’s Response: A Balancing Act Between Solidarity and Public Accountability
Throughout Kodwa’s legal battle, ANC leaders expressed support for him, with many emphasising solidarity in the face of adversity. Kodwa revealed that former ANC Youth League leaders, current officials, and even former President Kgalema Motlanthe reached out to offer encouragement. This display of solidarity, while reflective of the ANC’s culture of loyalty, has drawn criticism from those who feel the party prioritises unity over accountability.
The ANC’s response to Kodwa’s case raises questions about the party’s commitment to confronting corruption within its ranks. For many South Africans, the ANC’s backing of Kodwa exemplifies a broader issue of impunity for politically connected individuals. This perception is particularly damaging in a political environment where the ANC is already grappling with declining support due to widespread frustration over corruption and economic challenges.
Public Perception: Trust in the ANC and the Justice System
The decision to drop charges against Kodwa has elicited mixed reactions from the public. While his supporters celebrate the outcome as a vindication, others remain sceptical, viewing the case as yet another example of a justice system that favours the powerful. This scepticism is compounded by South Africa’s history of high-profile corruption cases that have ended without convictions, leading many to question the integrity of the country’s legal processes.
South Africans are increasingly disillusioned with the ANC’s promises to tackle corruption. Despite numerous assurances from ANC leaders that the party is committed to transparency, the public continues to see prominent figures avoid accountability. This disconnect between rhetoric and reality undermines the ANC’s credibility and fuels voter disillusionment, especially as the country approaches the next general election.
The EFF’s Stance on the Case: A Call for Accountability
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), South Africa’s third-largest party, has been vocal in its criticism of the ANC’s handling of corruption cases. The EFF has consistently positioned itself as a party committed to rooting out corruption, contrasting itself with what it describes as the ANC’s culture of impunity. In response to Kodwa’s case, EFF leaders have called for more rigorous enforcement of anti-corruption measures, arguing that the ANC’s approach undermines South Africa’s democratic institutions.
EFF leaders, including Julius Malema, have highlighted the need for systemic change to address corruption. The EFF has frequently accused the ANC of protecting its own, often at the expense of ordinary South Africans who bear the brunt of corruption’s impact on public services. By drawing attention to the Kodwa case, the EFF aims to galvanise support among voters who are frustrated with the ANC’s perceived inability to address corruption effectively.
Download Here:
Read all our publications on magzter:
https://www.magzter.com/ZA/Central-News-Pty-Ltd/Central-News/Newspaper/All-Issues
_______________________
Central News also offers Sponsored Editorial Content, Podcasts , Radio / Social Media Simulcast, Video Production , Live Streaming Services, Press Conferences, and Paid Interviews (Video/Audio) etc.
We guarantee exceptional exposure, reach, and engagement, with an excellent return on investment.
Advertisement:
To place your advert on our platforms (Print Newspaper or Digital Platforms) : Please email : sales@centralnews.co.za
For Business Related:
business@centralnews.co.za
Newsroom:
Send your Stories / Media Statements To: newsroom@centralnews.co.za
General Info:
info@centralnews.co.za
Office Administrator:
admin@centralnews.co.za
Whatsapp / Call: 081 495 5487
Website: https://www.centralnews.co.za
Social Media Platforms (@centralnewsza) : Linkedin, Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube
#centralnewsza #freestate